On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:41:39PM -0500, Adam Haas Tarr wrote: > 2) Since it is a Condorcet-compliant method, it shares all the weaknesses that > all Condorcet methods have in the eyes of the IRV advocates (i.e. the weak > center winner). I don't think an IRV supporter would see this as a compromise.
Since it requires multiple rounds, it also shares IRV's non-summability problem, so there a lot of Condorcet supporters who wouldn't see it as a compromise either. Joe ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
