A non-encrypted voting receipt that identifies the votes cast by a voter creates 
potential for mischief, particularly if it is retained by the individual voter.  Thugs 
could demand to see the receipt and intimidate voters, imposing physical, economic or 
social harm on those who voted "incorrectly".  Also, counterfeit receipts could be 
utilized to falsely challange election outcomes.

Open source vote tallying software would be helpful, particularly if it runs on 
desktop computers.  Citizens could download the votes from the internet and execute 
the program to verify the outcome.  That is just one small piece of the overall need 
for transperancy throughout the process.  Generally, the more transparancy the better.

According to the NY Times, in the U.S. the election software is protected by 
trade-secret clauses that prevents third parties from checking the software to see if 
there any bugs or malfunctions.  The three major companies, Dibold, Election Systems & 
Software sand Sequoia Voting Systems all routinely include such clauses in their 
contracts.  Furthermore, the certification process for voting machines is also opaque. 
 The certification result reports are not available to the public and experts maintain 
that the certification process is not as thorough as it should be.

Representative Rush D. Holt, Democrat from NJ, introduced a bill last year to would 
require computerized voting systems to produce a voter-verified paper ballot and 
mandate that the software code be publicly available.  The bill has 60 co-sponsors all 
of whom are Democrats (note to US citizens: This is another example of why we need to 
elect more Democrats and fewer Republicans).

Professors at John Hopkins and Rice Universities wrote wrote a critical report saying 
that there is "no evidence of regorous software engineering discipline and the 
"cryptology, when used at all, is used incorrectly".  SAIC, a Maryland based 
engineering and research firm, also write a critical report recommending 17 steps 
that Maryland elections officials could take to ensure better security.
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to