Dear Eric, you wrote:
> If two or more pairwise defeats have an equal strength and the > margins are also equal, they are considered to be equivalent. > Starting with the strongest defeat, consider each defeat in > sequence with previously kept defeats, if any. If two or more > defeats are equivalent, those defeats are considered together > with previously kept defeats, if any. If any defeat under > consideration is apart of a cycle, it is rejected. If any defeat > under consideration is not apart of a cycle, it is kept. I suggest that sentence 4 should be replaced by: > If q equivalent defeats under consideration are parts of a cycle > with previously kept defeats, the q! possible ways to consider > one of these defeats after the other are considered separately. Markus Schulze ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
