Two questions: (1) what methods actually meet strong FBC?
(2) Assuming ERBucklin means Bucklin where equal-ranking is allowed, why the "Equal" part? If it meets strong FBC, why would anyone want to equal-rank? Ok, so that's three questions. Bart MIKE OSSIPOFF wrote: > > A number of ways have been suggested for making FBC more demanding. Here's > what I meant by "strong FBC", when I said that ERBucklin(whole) meets Strong > FBC: > > Strong FBC: > > A voter has a "favorite" if there's 1 candidate whom that voter prefers to > every one of the other candidates. That candidate is hir favorite. > > In a particular election, by voting another candidate equal to or over hir > favorite, a voter shouldn't gain an outcome that s/he prefers to every > outcome that s/he could get in that election without voting another > candidate equal to or over hir favorite. > > [end of strong FBC definition] > > As I said, when I say "Bucklin", I mean ERBucklin(whole). ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
