Except for terminology changes, this seems just like what we have now in the US.
"Electors" are our proxies for the selection of President and Vice President, and we elect Representatives to Congress as proxies for for having all of us get together and vote on every issue. Adding another layer by having us elect electors to elect representatives dose not seem to me to make the democracy more representative. At first look, it seems to me to make it even more possible for a dominant party to become more dominant. Personally, I'd like my vote to count to more, not less. There's no existing "proxy" system that doesn't favor the incumbents. Anyway, we in the US already have all of this. You always how to get back to how to elect representatives and select proxies. Personally, I think all of us should watch the debates on CSPAN and then tell our representatives to shut up and let US participate in the roll-call vote. (Watch C-SPAN, you'll find that your representative is arguing that your interests aren't even a consideration, your representative only represents the interests that funded the election effort). ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
