James Green-Armytage writes:
> Also, actually ranking later choices in the compromise group at 100 is
>rarely necessary to prevent members of the greater evil group from
>winning. It depends on the size of the majority, the size of the cycle,
>etc. I just wrote "100" because that is the simple, mathematically
>tautological way to do it.
Err, I meant "actually RATING later choices in the compromise group at
..."
Not the first time I've made that mistake. Sorry.
James
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
