Sure, Weighted Pairwise, from what you've said, seems to improve on the criterion compliances of ordinary wv.
I haven't thoroughly compared WP to ordinary wv with AERLO & ATLO. WP may not offer the strategy improvements of AERLO & ATLO.
Of course Weighted Pairwise is more complicated than ordinary wv, and so an initial Condorcet proposal should probably be ordinary unenhanced wv. AERLO & ATLO could then easily be proposed later, as needed, as add-ons.
If that later proposal were Weighted Pairwise, a more complicated different method, it probably would be more difficult to get acceptance for.
Maybe the AERLO & ATLO options, with Weighted Pairwise, would result in more improvement than either enhancement by itself.
Mike Ossipoiff
_________________________________________________________________
Don�t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
