Dear Craig, you wrote (7 Jan 2005): > Well, I didn't underestimate your intelligence when I > expected that you would be perfectly unable to solve > the easy problem of deriving a solution to the 2 candidate > 1 winner election problem.
Well, this depends on what you mean with "solving" 2-candidate 1-winner elections. In the 2-candidate case, FPP satisfies all important criteria (e.g. anonymity, neutrality, non-dictatorship, Pareto, strategyproofness, monotonicity, participation, consistency, resolvability). If, in your opinion, FPP doesn't "solve" the 2-candidate 1-winner case, then what does it mean to "solve" the 2-candidate 1-winner case? Markus Schulze ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
