Dear Mike, you wrote (15 Feb 2005): > Would someone post definitions of the uncovered set and > the minimal dominant set? Or links to the definitions? > I was probably away from the list when those sets were > defined on EM.
Usually, the uncovered set is defined only for situations without pairwise ties. When there are no pairwise ties, then the uncovered set is identical to the "Fishburn winners". We discussed Fishburn winners between 1994 and 1996. See e.g.: http://lists.electorama.com/htdig.cgi/election-methods-electorama.com/1996-June/000441.html http://lists.electorama.com/htdig.cgi/election-methods-electorama.com/1996-June/000443.html http://lists.electorama.com/htdig.cgi/election-methods-electorama.com/1996-October/000753.html Markus Schulze ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
