>
>I'll call it Pairwise Approval Voting (PAV).
>
>The tally procedure starts with the construction of a pairwise matrix
>from the ordinal information in each vote.
>The CW wins if one exists, otherwise the least-approved
>candidate is dropped until a CW is found.
>
>Do you consider it better than, worse than, or equivalent to, standard
>Approval Voting? Why?
I dunno. Equivalent? Seems like the approval winner (highest sum of
approvals) will always be the "CW". Right?
James
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
