Thanks for the comments regarding Arrow's theorem. It helped hash some things out in the discussion section of wikipedia, and I ended up able to get a more modified objection of the *usage* of Arrow's theorem back in the wiki page. Here it is:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow%27s_impossibility_theorem

Of note, the previous summary definition of Arrow's theorem was:

"In voting systems, "Arrow's impossibility theorem", or "Arrow's paradox" demonstrates the impossibility of designing a set of rules for social decision making that would obey every "reasonable" criterion required by society."

The new summary definition on the wiki page is:

"In voting systems, "Arrow's impossibility theorem", or "Arrow's paradox" demonstrates the impossibility of designing a set of rules for social decision making that would pass all the criteria collected by Arrow in the theorem. The theorem is frequently misrepresented as a proof that a reasonable voting method is impossible."

More is added in a discussion section.

Curt

----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to