Classifying kinds of elections:
Presidential: In their own world, and I say little - keep the Electoral College, partly because national popular vote can be poisoned too much by cheating in whatever states will tolerate that, and there is a deliberate bias in favor of small states that makes Constitutional Amendments that remove the bias impractical. BUT, a Constitutional Amendment that requires Electoral College membership from each state to be distributed according to votes for each candidate in that state seems possible and useful.
Single offices, such as governor, mayor, and US Senator: Elect them, and I argue that Condorcet is good enough, and better than Plurality, IRV, AV, etc.
Bodies that attract thoughts of PR, such as US House delegations from a state, legislatures, etc. Let those in control of each, when they choose to, substitute the proxy-based system described below (I will talk of "body" as a general label):
Body details:
Each voter, eligible to elect a member of the body, finds another such voter who is at least somewhat in agreement as to goals, and is willing to act as proxy, and registers this agreement as part of their voter registration (just as a voter votes separately for city council and US House member, they are members of separate trees of proxies and register for each - nothing wrong with a voter being a proxy in more than one such tree and registered accordingly - the trees are independent).
Part of the agreement between voter and proxy relates to communication:
Some voters only want to find a proxy with desired goals and abilities - and ask no more.
Some voters want to also have debate and communication within the group - and need to find a proxy willing and able to cooperate.
Proxies, in turn, register in the same way with other proxies.
Each proxy has as many votes as they represent, directly or indirectly; a voter with no proxy would have one vote.
Body membership has as a goal about the size it would have if elected.
Those proxies with the most votes. To avoid proxies so strong as to have too much power, have a limit on weighted vote per member (WANT those who represent more voters to be stronger, BUT do not want any one proxy to be too strong).
Voting in the body is by weighted vote. If there are too many proxies, those beyond the membership limit have no vote in the body - it is up to them to combine or find someone to be proxy to a bunch of such.
Where we got to: Somewhat like PR, we have groups of voters within the whole district assembled by interest, and with voting power to fit.
Beats PR, for all those in the district sharing an interest can be represented by a single proxy - or by multiple proxies backing that interest if it is very popular.
Voters can move from proxy to proxy as they see goals match and mismatch. Can happen at anytime, but need enough sand in the gears (rules) to keep some stability.
Can have proxies representing extreme positions. They group together in bands of enough voters to back their positions, or cooperate to the extent that is effective.
------------------------------------------- I wrote the following in 1998. What is above adds some flesh.
Something is needed to strengthen "by the people". An alternative method of representation is offered for thought:
* Everyone retains present right to be a voter, but may assign that
right to a proxy who, by soliciting the job of representing voters with
one set of interests, accepts responsibility for using the voters' rights
to further those interests and for keeping the voters informed. The voter
may recall such assignment at any time. There is no limit on the number of
voters directly served by a single proxy, but it is in each voter's
interest to choose a proxy personally known to be responsible, with an
appropriate platform, and willing and able to keep the voter informed.
However, since the proxies discussed above would be too numerous to meet
effectively for tasks such as electing or recalling a senator, proxies may
follow the above rules in assigning their voters' rights to other proxies.
Candidates must start at the bottom and get recommended to the next level
by at least one proxy at each level - this is a simple formality for
well-known politicians, but is needed as a mechanism for controlling
introduction of newcomers.
* Reasonable stability is needed. Recall should always be possible,
but require a super majority such as 2/3 or 3/4 (easier to achieve via
proxies than via individual voters). The recalled political office or
voter rights should automatically be voted against any activity for a
fixed period of time (the idea is for recall to always be possible, but to
be done only to recover from serious problems).
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] people.clarityconnect.com/webpages3/davek
Dave Ketchum 108 Halstead Ave, Owego, NY 13827-1708 607-687-5026
Do to no one what you would not want done to you.
If you want peace, work for justice.
---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
