Hi Forest,
--- "Simmons, Forest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a �crit :
> Kevin, thanks for supplying the details of MMPO's FBC compliance.
>
> I never doubted it since I suggested it back in March 2003, inspired by your
> "median winner"
> method for two slot ballots.
Hmm, interesting. Since understanding what FBC means (i.e. sometime after your
message), I never supposed MMPO might satisfy FBC.
> I was discouraged when Markus and Steve pointed out to me that MMPO failed
> Clone Winner, since
> Clone Winner compliance is important for avoiding the spoiler problem.
>
> It seems like there should be some way to get around that.
The closest I've seen is CDTT,RandomBallot or CDTT,DSC. But I was interested
in preserving LNHarm compliance. Perhaps with an eye towards FBC something
closer
can be devised.
> How about Reynaud (PO)? Does the sequential elimination wreck the FBC?
Since it satisfies Condorcet, I'm pretty sure that it must.
Kevin Venzke
_____________________________________________________________________________
D�couvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 1 Go d'espace de stockage pour vos mails,
photos et vid�os !
Cr�ez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
