Ken: >> the fundamental problem with >> plain Condorcet is that it doesn't directly take into consideration >which >> position candidates are ranked in.
Jobst:
>
>Well, I would rather say that this is the main *advantage* of methods
>which consider pairwise preferences and/or approval scores instead of
>rank positions, because the rank position per se has no significance at
>all!
I agree.
my best,
James
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
