RLSuter-at-aol.com |EMlist| wrote:
In a message dated 6/6/05, Russ Paielli wrote:
when I found out that they
blatantly oppose the First Amendment I dumped them ASAP.
What else can you call a prohibition on "issue-advocacy"
ads within 60 days before a general election? And what part
of "Congress shall pass no law ..." don't they understand?
I thought this list was about election methods. Half-informed
pronouncements like the above belong elsewhere. The idea
that political ads can't be regulated even when broadcast
on publicly owned airwaves is not a viewpoint that can be
fairly derived from a reading of the first amendment.
Yes, it was a slightly off-topic tangent, but the best election method
in the world is worthless if free speech is squelched during the
campaign. When the government gets into the business of deciding who is
and is not allowed to run political ads before an election, it's on a
very slippery slope. Also, the bit about "publicly owned" airwaves is a
red herring. Unless I am mistaken, the LWV recommendations had no such
qualification and applied equally to cable TV, for example.
http://RussP.org/CFreform.htm
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
