Mike, you wrote:
>Yes, that sounds right. If I earlier said that MMPO can have
>compromising-reversal incentive, then I should have just said that MMPO
>can
>have reversal incentive.
Agreed.
>MMPO can have burying reversal incentive, as you
>define "burying": lowering someone in order to keep him/her from winning.
Agreed.
>
Sincerely,
James
P.S. I wrote:
>Example 1: sincere preferences R>S>T>U. Why could R>T>U>S be better than
>R>S=T>U in terms of decreasing the chances that U will win?
That was a typo. I meant:
"Example 1: sincere preferences R>S>T>U. Why could **R>T>S>U** be better
than
R>S=T>U in terms of decreasing the chances that U will win?"
My apologies for the mistake.
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
