I already mentioned that, under the question that asked if methods should force people to vote sincerely, I added one that asks if a method should get rid of the lesser-of-evils problem.

I've also added one more question: Under the question that asks if simplicity (or something) is more important than "anti-strategic" properties, I added a question that asks if reducing need for strategy is more important than a method's "vulnerability to strategy".

That's an area in which people are seriously missing the point. I'm not saying that's important to me, but I felt that I should say something. Beyond that, having done what I can, I don't care; repeat whatever gives you satisfaction to repeat.

Mike Ossipoff

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to