In a context where the norm is simple plurality, with overvotes resulting in the ballot being discarded (for the race with extra votes), the simplest reform is repealing the rule that discards such ballots. This simple change implements Approval voting, which is potentially a strong reform.

Further, in a few days, so far, of searching, there seems to be a distinct lack of cogent arguments for the rule in the first place. As near as I can tell, the reason for it is a variant on "It seemed like the thing to do at the time." The rule is clearly very old.

Certainly Approval is not a full election reform. But it would be a major step, and probably one that would, at worst, do little or no harm. Whereas discarding overvotes clearly causes harm, with every election.

Overvotes can result from a number of conditions, only some of which are errors. And I think a good argument could be made that discarding erroneous overvotes does more harm than keeping them.

Even though there is a little acknowledgement from the Election Methods community that keeping and counting, in full, overvotes is indeed equivalent to Approval, I don't think that the tactical implications are being adequately considered.

It *might* be a much easier reform to accomplish. Approval is extremely simple to understand and, as often noted, no ballot changes are needed, beyond some changes in ballot instructions. The fact appears to be that these changes would simply make the real conditions of voting more closely correspond to what people who are not informed would already expect. You have to know that overvotes will be discarded, and many voters don't know that, and I have never seen the fact printed on a ballot. Without specific knowledge, I would simply assume that all votes would be counted, and, indeed, it appears that many voters do have that idea.

Any reform at all might break the logjam. This one would probably change outcomes gradually, not all at once, except possibly in some close races.


----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to