Dear Jobst,
--- Jobst Heitzig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Does the CDTT have any other significance than the connection with Minimal
> Defense? In other
> words, what would you think of a method satisfying minimal defense but not
> CDTT?
I would rather let Markus discuss such issues as truncation resistance.
I was drawn to the CDTT because it satisfies minimal defense and is very easy
on Later-no-harm methods (in the sense that it does not force them to fail
Later-no-harm unless there are majority-strength cycles).
I am fine with methods that satisfy minimal defense but not CDTT. Especially,
because I don't believe CDTT is compatible with the favorite betrayal criterion
when there are more than three candidates.
Kevin Venzke
___________________________________________________________________________
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
