I wrote:
And then (or perhaps as we see this approaching) we could proceed with further reform. As I've stated before, there are better methods; but when I have described one of them, it has happened that my posts have been rejected as not being relevant to "Condorcet." We'll see if this one gets through.....
Oops! I was confused. These subjects are under discussion on the Condorcet list, and I thought I was writing to that list. EM is not ordinarily moderated. Frankly, I think it is weird that the Condorcet list is. I understand the purpose, but there are better ways to accomplish it....
In fact, one of the posts that was rejected was really about just how to filter the noise, *without* creating a content czar. Odd, isn't it, that democratic reform movements so often reject democratic process as being impossibly inefficient?
---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
