For the record, I do not claim to have a definition of FBC. At most, I wanted to discuss it in practical terms. It doesn't seem possible, though, because Craig Carey will not admit "voters" to a scenario.
--- Craig Carey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a �crit�: > At 03\03\09 20:53 +0100 Sunday, Kevin Venzke wrote: > >Approval for a candidate is calculated as the > number > >of ballots on which he is not ranked last. (Ties > are > ... > > "last" (?). That may be an entirely different > "Approval" > word. Right. That quote was from a proposal. I'm going to start a new message on it, though, because I've thought it through better. You may like it. As for all of the below, I have to say that you are not very generous. > Mr Venzke has GOT IT -- the definition of FBC. > > To honour that, I shall now write Mr Venkze's name > in upper > case, like this: KEVIN VENKZE. > > That is an interim thing, until the VENKZE > definition of FBC > is ported onto a QE solver so that there can't be > much doubt > on whether it is defined or not. > > I hope that Mr VENKZE is as quick as possible at > getting the > definition out. > > The words "Perhaps I can define FBC" are perhaps > only about > a symbolic transforming of the definition that was > held. > > Scandals about wrong thinking of OSSIPOFFists is > sometimes > interesting too. ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en fran�ais ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Election-methods mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.electorama.com/listinfo.cgi/election-methods-electorama.com
