James Gilmour wrote:

I didn't understand your comment about majoritarian rule amongst the elected
representatives. No matter how you build a consensus on any issue, at the end of
the day it will require majority support in the Parliament if it is to become
accepted national policy.


I was probably being too glib, but what I meant by this is that there's a number of decisions (e.g. selection of a prime minister) where the coalition building is made very difficult by the fact that it's done using first-past-the-post (FPTP) rather than approval, Condorcet, IRV, etc. Even things that are seemingly simple up/down votes often involve a series of amendments and riders. Moving to proportional representation ensures that there's better representation on issues, but in current practice relegates those representatives to use FPTP for everything.

That will apply no matter whether you have majority
government of one party or a coalition, or minority government.  Of course, you
can improve the stability of the Parliament (and of the government) by avoiding
the stupid rule that any successful vote against the government automatically
means that the government falls.

Indeed, that seems pretty awful. Is that what Poland is doing?

Rob


---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to