election-methods-list  

Messages by Date

• 2002/02/12 [EM] 02/12/02 - Approval Voting via Plurality-at-Large: Donald Davison
• 2002/02/11 Re: [EM] To Blake, re: strategy Rob Lanphier
• 2002/02/11 Re: [EM] To Blake, re: strategy Bart Ingles
• 2002/02/11 Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/11 Re: [EM] Sincerity for criteria, Blake Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/11 Re: [EM] Approval, IRV, FBC, Blake Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/11 [EM] Plurality loser DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/11 Re: [EM] Finding the probable best candidate? Blake Cretney
• 2002/02/11 Re: [EM] To Blake, re: strategy Blake Cretney
• 2002/02/11 Re: [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/11 Re: [EM] To Blake, re: strategy Markus Schulze
• 2002/02/10 [EM] Finding the probable best candidate? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/02/10 [EM] To Blake, re: strategy MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/02/10 [EM] To Donald on Approval & IRV MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/02/09 RE: Approval Voting in Action? Anthony Simmons
• 2002/02/09 [EM] Yahoo email lists DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/09 RE: 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates: DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/09 [EM] Approval Voting in Action? Anthony Simmons
• 2002/02/09 RE: Open and Closed Lists (was ...STV for Candidate...) DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/09 [EM] Approval Voting in Action? Alex Small
• 2002/02/09 Re: [EM] 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates: Richard Moore
• 2002/02/09 Re: [EM] 02/09/02 - Approval favors certain candidates: Bart Ingles
• 2002/02/09 Re: [EM] 02/09/02 - Approval favors certain candidates: Richard Moore
• 2002/02/09 [EM] 02/09/02 - Approval favors certain candidates: Donald Davison
• 2002/02/08 Re: [EM] Open and Closed Lists (was ...STV for Candidate...) Olli Salmi
• 2002/02/08 RE: Open and Closed Lists (was ...STV for Candidate...) DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/08 Re:[EM] Settle for how much less? Anthony Simmons
• 2002/02/08 Re:[EM] Settle for how much less? Alex Small
• 2002/02/07 [EM] Settle for how much less? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/02/07 [EM] Where is the political center? Where will it be? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/02/07 RE: Condorcet PR (was Comparing ranked versus unranked methods) DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/07 Re: 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equalcandidates: DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/07 RE: [STV-voting] 02/02/02 - The New South Wales council: Crabb, Deane (PIRSA)
• 2002/02/06 RE: Open and Closed Lists (was ...STV for Candidate...) DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/06 [EM] Approval, IRV, FBC, Blake MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/02/06 Re: [EM] 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates: Richard Moore
• 2002/02/06 Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Bart Ingles
• 2002/02/06 Re: [EM] 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equalcandidates: Bart Ingles
• 2002/02/06 Re: [EM] To Blake, re: standards Blake Cretney
• 2002/02/06 Re: [EM] Sincerity for criteria, Blake Blake Cretney
• 2002/02/06 [EM] Open and Closed Lists (was ...STV for Candidate...) Blake Cretney
• 2002/02/06 RE: 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates: DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/06 [EM] House Sets Campaign Finance Vote DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/06 Re: [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods Adam Tarr
• 2002/02/06 Re: [EM] Definitions for Comparing Voting Power Alex Small
• 2002/02/06 Re: [EM] PR/STV Hybrid for multi-winner? Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/06 [EM] Re: IRV in WA state DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/06 Re: [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/06 Re: [EM] 02/03/02 - STV for Candidate Lists: Olli Salmi
• 2002/02/06 Re: [EM] Definitions for Comparing Voting Power Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/06 Re: [EM] 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates: Adam Tarr
• 2002/02/06 Re: [EM] IRV in WA state Bart Ingles
• 2002/02/06 [EM] 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates: Donald Davison
• 2002/02/05 Re: [EM] IRV in WA state Bart Ingles
• 2002/02/05 [EM] Re:Definitions for Comparing Voting Power Alex Small
• 2002/02/05 RE: Definitions for Comparing Voting Power DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/05 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Steve Barney
• 2002/02/05 [EM] IRV in WA state Anthony Simmons
• 2002/02/05 Re: [EM] IRV in WA state MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/02/05 [EM] IRV in WA state Douglas Greene
• 2002/02/05 [EM] Definitions for Comparing Voting Power Alex Small
• 2002/02/05 [EM] State legislatures minority rule dats DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/05 RE: Blake & strategy DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/05 Re: [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/05 Re: [EM] Sincerity for criteria, Blake Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/05 Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/05 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/05 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/05 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Markus Schulze
• 2002/02/05 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Markus Schulze
• 2002/02/04 Re: [EM] 02/04/02 - Approval is only for Beauty Contests: Richard Moore
• 2002/02/04 Re: Comparing ranked versus unranked methods MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/02/04 [EM] Blake & strategy MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/02/04 Re: 02/03/02 - STV for Candidate Lists: DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/04 Re: [EM] Sincerity for criteria, Blake Blake Cretney
• 2002/02/04 Re: [EM] 02/03/02 - STV for Candidate Lists: Blake Cretney
• 2002/02/04 [EM] IRV's criteria successes? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/02/04 Re: Markus & Manipulability MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/02/04 RE: Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/04 Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/04 Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Joe Weinstein
• 2002/02/04 Re: [EM] Book- Evaluation and Optimization of Electoral Systems Joe Weinstein
• 2002/02/04 Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Markus Schulze
• 2002/02/04 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/04 Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/04 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Markus Schulze
• 2002/02/04 Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/04 RE: Kuro5hin discussion on Political Parties DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/04 Re: [EM] 02/02/02 - Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp': Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/04 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/04 Re: [EM] 02/04/02 - Approval is only for Beauty Contests: Mark Borg
• 2002/02/04 [EM] 02/04/02 - Approval is only for Beauty Contests: Donald Davison
• 2002/02/04 [EM] 02/04/02 - Welcome to the Hare camp: Donald Davison
• 2002/02/03 [EM] 02/02/02 - Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp': Anthony Simmons
• 2002/02/03 Re: [EM] World Series and EC Anthony Simmons
• 2002/02/03 [EM] Kuro5hin discussion on Political Parties Rob Lanphier
• 2002/02/03 Re: [EM] 02/03/02 - STV for Candidate Lists: Adam Tarr
• 2002/02/03 [EM] Newcomers Claim New Orleans Runoff DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/03 [EM] 02/03/02 - STV for Candidate Lists: Donald Davison
• 2002/02/03 Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Markus Schulze
• 2002/02/02 [EM] Reply re: CVD. The Heritage Criterion. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/02/02 [EM] Sincerity for criteria, Blake MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/02/02 [EM] Markus & Manipulability MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/02/02 RE: 02/02/02 - Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp': DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/02 [EM] Re: Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp': Alexander Small
• 2002/02/02 Re: [EM] 02/02/02 - Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp': Adam Tarr
• 2002/02/02 [EM] 02/02/02 - Re: 01/31/02 - Two new design features for STV: Donald Davison
• 2002/02/02 [EM] 0/03/02 - FWD - [instantrunoff] IRV @ Carleton College! Donald Davison
• 2002/02/02 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Markus Schulze
• 2002/02/02 RE: Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff DEMOREP1
• 2002/02/02 [EM] 02/02/02 - FWD - The Australian Senate: Donald Davison
• 2002/02/02 [EM] 02/02/02 - FWD - WA State IRV bill hearing to be webcast: Donald Davison
• 2002/02/02 [EM] 02/02/02 - Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp': Donald Davison
• 2002/02/01 [EM] Power of Voting Blocs Alexander Small
• 2002/02/01 Re: [EM] World Series and EC Anthony Simmons
• 2002/02/01 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/01 [EM] My definition better carries out P&P's intent MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/02/01 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Markus Schulze
• 2002/02/01 Re: [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney: Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/01 Re: [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney: Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/01 Re: [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney: Adam Tarr
• 2002/02/01 Re: [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney: Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/01 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/01 Re: [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney: Forest Simmons
• 2002/02/01 Re: [EM] Plurality & Reguarity Markus Schulze
• 2002/02/01 [EM] my IIAC suggestion MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/02/01 [EM] Plurality & Reguarity MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/02/01 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Markus Schulze
• 2002/02/01 [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney: Donald Davison
• 2002/01/31 Re: [EM] World Series and EC Richard Moore
• 2002/01/31 [EM] World Series and EC Anthony Simmons
• 2002/01/31 [EM] Electoral College and Minority Vetoes Anthony Simmons
• 2002/01/31 Re: [EM] Electoral College-Pragmatic approach Richard Moore
• 2002/01/31 Re: [EM] Doesn't matter what preference means, Markus Anthony Simmons
• 2002/01/31 Re: [EM] PR/STV Hybrid for multi-winner? DEMOREP1
• 2002/01/31 Re: Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
• 2002/01/31 Re: Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Steve Barney
• 2002/01/31 Re: [EM] PR/STV Hybrid for multi-winner? Adam Tarr
• 2002/01/31 Re: [EM] PR/STV Hybrid for multi-winner? Mark Borg
• 2002/01/31 Re: [EM] World Series and EC Adam Tarr
• 2002/01/31 Re: [EM] PR/STV Hybrid for multi-winner? Olli Salmi
• 2002/01/31 [EM] World Series and EC Alexander Small
• 2002/01/31 [EM] Electoral College and Minority Vetoes Alexander Small
• 2002/01/31 Re: [EM] 01/31/02 - Two new design features for STV: Adam Tarr
• 2002/01/31 Re: [EM] Electoral College-Pragmatic approach Dave Ketchum
• 2002/01/31 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion definitions (was Markus' Econometrica reference...) Dave Ketchum
• 2002/01/31 RE: Condorcet Criterion definitions (was Markus' Econometrica reference...) DEMOREP1
• 2002/01/31 Re: [EM] P&P say there's only 1 preference profile. You don't say that. Markus Schulze
• 2002/01/31 [EM] 01/31/02 - Two new design features for STV: Donald Davison
• 2002/01/30 [EM] Idaho Lawmakers OK Term Limit Repeal DEMOREP1
• 2002/01/30 RE: Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff DEMOREP1
• 2002/01/30 [EM] P&P say there's only 1 preference profile. You don't say that. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/01/30 re: P&P & preferences & Blake MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/01/30 Re: [EM] Electoral College-Pragmatic approach Bart Ingles
• 2002/01/30 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion definitions (was Markus' Econometrica reference...) Adam Tarr
• 2002/01/30 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion definitions (was Markus' Econometrica reference...) Blake Cretney
• 2002/01/30 Re: [EM] Doesn't matter what preference means, Markus Blake Cretney
• 2002/01/30 Re: [EM] Electoral College-Pragmatic approach Richard Moore
• 2002/01/30 Re: [EM] Basic Monotony Richard Moore
• 2002/01/30 Re: [EM] Monotony and consistency - 3 examples Forest Simmons
• 2002/01/30 Re: [EM] The Electoral College (was Interesting use of Borda count) Anthony Simmons
• 2002/01/30 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
• 2002/01/30 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Steve Barney
• 2002/01/30 [EM] Re: Consensus on IRV & Runoff? DEMOREP1
• 2002/01/30 Re: Consensus on IRV & Runoff? Forest Simmons
• 2002/01/30 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
• 2002/01/30 Re: [EM] Not logical electoral system? Olli Salmi
• 2002/01/30 Re: Consensus on IRV & Runoff? Forest Simmons
• 2002/01/30 [EM] Not logical electoral system? Jurij Toplak
• 2002/01/30 Re: [EM] Doesn't matter what preference means, Markus Markus Schulze
• 2002/01/30 Re: [EM] Monotony and consistency - 3 examples Joe Weinstein
• 2002/01/30 [EM] Monotony and consistency - 3 examples Joe Weinstein
• 2002/01/30 [EM] Basic Monotony Joe Weinstein
• 2002/01/30 Re: Consensus on IRV & Runoff? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/01/29 [EM] Condorcet Criterion definitions (was Markus' Econometrica reference...) MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/01/29 [EM] Doesn't matter what preference means, Markus MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/01/29 RE: Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff DEMOREP1
• 2002/01/29 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Bart Ingles
• 2002/01/29 Re: [EM] Question on CVD Anthony Simmons
• 2002/01/29 Re: [EM] Question on CVD Bart Ingles
• 2002/01/29 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Bart Ingles
• 2002/01/29 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
• 2002/01/29 Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
• 2002/01/29 [EM] Question on CVD Alexander Small
• 2002/01/29 [EM] Electoral College-Pragmatic approach Alexander Small
• 2002/01/29 [EM] Interest in voting theory Steve Barney
• 2002/01/29 RE: Markus' Econometrica reference on RB & IIAC DEMOREP1
• 2002/01/29 Re: [EM] Markus' Econometrica reference on RB & IIAC Markus Schulze
• 2002/01/28 Re: Markus' Econometrica reference on RB & IIAC Blake Cretney
• 2002/01/28 Re: [EM] 01/29/02 - Re: Electoral College Debate: Richard Moore
• 2002/01/28 Re: [EM] Re: Electoral College Forest Simmons
• 2002/01/28 Re: Fascinating website Anthony Simmons
• 2002/01/28 Re: Markus' Econometrica reference on RB & IIAC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/01/28 Re: Fascinating website Richard Moore
• 2002/01/28 Re: Fascinating website MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/01/28 Re: [EM] 01/29/02 - Re: Electoral College Debate: Blake Cretney
• 2002/01/28 Re: Fascinating website Anthony Simmons
• 2002/01/28 Re: Fascinating website MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/01/28 [EM] More uses for grade ballots Forest Simmons
• 2002/01/28 Re: [EM] The Electoral College (was Interesting use of Borda count) Forest Simmons

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]