Dear Craig, could you -please- explain your method using the following example with 100 voters and 4 candidates running for 3 seats? 30 voters vote A > B > C > D. 26 voters vote B > D > A > C. 24 voters vote C > B > A > D. 20 voters vote D > B > A > C. Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferential v... Craig Carey
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferenti... David Catchpole
- [EM] IIA Theory Craig Carey
- Re: [EM] IIA Theory David Catchpole
- Re: [EM] IIA Theory David Catchpole
- Re: [EM] IIA Theory Craig Carey
- Re: [EM] IIA Theory David Catchpole
- Re: [EM] IIA Theory Craig Carey
- Re: [EM] IIA Theory David Catchpole
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferential v... David Catchpole
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferential voting Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferential voting Craig Carey
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferential voting David Catchpole
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferential voting Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferential voting Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferential voting Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferential voting Craig Carey
- [EM] (P1) defined Craig Carey
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferential voting Markus Schulze
- RE: [EM] Proportional preferential voting Wiseman, Julian
- RE: [EM] Proportional preferential voting David Catchpole
