Craig Carey wrote: > The idea might be a lot sounder if [Mr Saari] had instead expected > invariance of the winners in 3 candidate election had 6, not 3, papers been > added. I.e. these papers: ABC, BCA, CAB, ACB, CBA, BAC. In that case you have no need to look for rotational symmetry -- you already have 3 cases of reflectional symmetry: ABC cancels CBA, BCA cancels ACB, etc.
- [EM] The Symmetry and complexity of elections Norman Petry
- Re: [EM] The Symmetry and complexity of elections Rob Lanphier
- [EM] Symmetric cyclic AB+BC+CA rule rejects STV Craig Carey
- Bart Ingles
