Do feel welcome to define the two types of randomness, carefully distinguishing one from the other. > -----Original Message----- > From: David Catchpole [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 7:30 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [EM] Proportional preferential voting > > On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Wiseman, Julian wrote: > > > Indeed, Lord Weedon almost but not quites manages to conclude that > > non-monotonic systems have embedded randomness -- something not widely > > acknowledged. > > That's chaotic randomness, not probabilistic randomness. Lovely stuff. A > small range of perturbations will lead to a wide range of outcomes.
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferential voting Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferential voting Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferential voting Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferential voting Craig Carey
- [EM] (P1) defined Craig Carey
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferential voting Markus Schulze
- RE: [EM] Proportional preferential voting Wiseman, Julian
- RE: [EM] Proportional preferential voting David Catchpole
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferential voting Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Proportional preferential voting Craig Carey
- RE: [EM] Proportional preferential voting Wiseman, Julian
- RE: [EM] Proportional preferential voting David Catchpole
- [EM] Preferential voting and non-monotonicity Tom Round
