Dear Steve,

in so far as IBCM is a successive elimination method, it is
not obvious that IBCM meets monotonicity. Could you please
demonstrate that IBCM meets monotonicity?

******

You wrote (11 May 2000):
> The older "Tideman fails GMC" example posted by Mike O was even
> more extreme, showing the Schulze method preferred a candidate
> even though no voter preferred it to the Tideman winner which
> beat it pairwise.

I couldn't find in the archives Mike's example where the Schulze
method chooses a Pareto inferior candidate. Could you please
repost this example?

Markus Schulze
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to