Dear Mike, you wrote (http://www.egroups.com/message/election-methods-list/5432): > I'm only talking about committees & meetings because, as I said, > SD, SSD, & Schulze choose the same winner under many-voter > conditions. The following example demonstrates that even under many-voter conditions SD, SSD and Schulze can choose different winners: A:B=34:66 A:C=64:36 A:D=46:54 A:E=49:51 A:F=63:37 B:C=35:65 B:D=45:55 B:E=48:52 B:F=43:57 C:D=44:56 C:E=47:53 C:F=42:58 D:E=40:60 D:F=62:38 E:F=39:61 The pairwise matrix doesn't contain identical elements. If SD is used then candidate D wins decisively. If SSD or Schulze is used then candidate C wins decisively. Markus Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze MIKE OSSIPOFF
