Dear Mike,
you wrote (20 Aug 2000):
> Some people might like or understand Tideman better. Some people
> might like or understand SSD better. So why not include both,
> to increase the number of people who like & understand at least
> one of our top methods?
>
> Or does it seem really important to just include one? I don't want
> to take a defensive tone, because we did ask for list members'
> advice. Maybe you're right. But what about the consideration of
> doubling the chance that a particular reader will find something
> that he/she understands & likes?
I believe that the set of readers who understand PC and the set of
readers who understand Tideman and the set of readers who understand
SSD are almost congruent. Therefore I believe that by proposing three
methods instead of only one method you cannot increase the number of
readers significantly who understand at least one of the proposed
methods.
Markus Schulze
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
