Hugh T wrote:
-snip-
>For three-candidate races, where it is not burdensome, Donald's
>Condorcet ballot may be better even without computers.
-snip-
I don't think it's wise to allow voters to vote intransitive
preferences. I don't agree with Hugh that there's something
significant which would be gained. And it would make voting
too error-prone.
For instance, what do you make of the vote:
A>B, B>C, C>A
Is it more likely such a vote was a mistake or that the voter had an
unusual set of preferences?
---Steve (Steve Eppley [EMAIL PROTECTED])
