CV&D is not "myopically focussing on the parliamentary form (with prop rep" as the 'only' way to get rid of the two party system...." If you mean that CV&D is supporting the parliamentary system to replace Congress, you are wrong. CV&D has taken no position on that. I am fairly certain that some CV&D members may want that, and others may oppose it, but the organization has never taken a position on that. I think the closest we have come to a position on the parliamentary system is to point out that the "bad" examples often brought against PR are irrelevant to America which has a division between the executive and legislature.
