Woops! That should be "nonmonotonicity" rather than "monotonicity"! ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 15:41:33 +1000 (GMT+1000) From: David Catchpole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: STV without Elimination Resent-Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1998 22:40:43 -0700 Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Tideman's system basically weights STV outcomes. I've read his articles, >and when I think of it, his system, while it may possibly avoid >monotonicity, does diverge significantly from what I suggested. By the
