Oops! Today, I mistakenly wrote: >that's been proposed. Aside from failing Markus' "Positive Participation" >criterion (which I don't think any method has been proven to satisfy), it's That should have been "No-Punishment Criterion", rather than "Positive Participation Criterion". Also both Mike and Markus did point out a number of (otherwise inferior) methods which do meet this criterion. I guess I should have checked my notes! Sorry about that. Norm Petry
- Re: Tideman vs. Schulze Norman Petry
- Re: Tideman vs. Schulze Mike Ositoff
- RE: Tideman vs. Schulze DEMOREP1
- Re: Tideman vs. Schulze David Marsay
- Re: Tideman vs. Schulze Markus Schulze
- Re: Tideman vs. Schulze Norman Petry
- Re: Tideman vs. Schulze DEMOREP1
