Oops!

Today, I mistakenly wrote:

>that's been proposed.  Aside from failing Markus' "Positive Participation"
>criterion (which I don't think any method has been proven to satisfy), it's

That should have been "No-Punishment Criterion", rather than "Positive
Participation Criterion".  Also both Mike and Markus did point out a number
of (otherwise inferior) methods which do meet this criterion.  I guess I
should have checked my notes!

Sorry about that.


Norm Petry


Reply via email to