[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [snip]
> Being serious, I suggest again that (1) there be a YES/NO vote on executive
> and judicial officer candidates so that obvious bad case folk do NOT get
> elected (along with a Condorcet number vote 1, 2, 3, etc. to choose among the
> choices that have apparent majority YES acceptability votes [snip]
Wouldn't it work as well to allow a "none of the above" vote to serve as
a placeholder? Anything above the placeholder would be considered a YES
vote, anything below a NO. The only difference is that you would not be
able to rank a NO above a YES.
