Steve, Thanks for your comments. There is quite a bit of work to be done with my demo, and I think all of your comments are valid. Unfortunately, I'm not going to be able to incorporate any of the changes until at least February, so I'd really like to encourage you or anyone else on this list to grab the source and play around with it. I'll gladly accept any changes (provided they work) and credit all contributors. Part of the reason why you don't see Smith//Condorcet calculated is because my work so far has been to lay the groundwork for arbitrary combination and ordering of methods. This is a loftier goal from which the simpler goal of a Smith//Condorcet calculator would fall out. I'd like to make this the back end for one or many friendly front-end programs that feed it well-formed input. Rob Lanphier [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.eskimo.com/~robla
