Bart wrote: >But the probability of B or C being in a tie, given a >tie exists, is not necessarily proportional to the likelihood of B or C >winning. Certainly not. It's proportional to the square root of the likelihood of winning. You might say "But isn't that just a rough estimate?, rather than the actual probability?". But what is the actual probability than our best estimate of it, however rough an estimate it is? And so, if we're estimating individual frontrunner probabilities from win probabilities than a candidate's individual frontrunner probability is proportional to the square root of his win probability. Mike Ossipoff _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
- Re: Mathematical utility expectation maximization in Approva... Bart Ingles
- [EM] Equivalence of two approval strategy formulas Richard Moore
- Re: Mathematical utility expectation maximization in Approva... MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: Mathematical utility expectation maximization in Approva... MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: Mathematical utility expectation maximization in Ap... Richard Moore
- Re: Mathematical utility expectation maximization i... Bart Ingles
- Re: Mathematical utility expectation maximizati... Richard Moore
- Re: Mathematical utility expectation maximization in Approva... MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: Mathematical utility expectation maximization in Approva... MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: Mathematical utility expectation maximization in Approva... MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: Mathematical utility expectation maximization in Approva... MIKE OSSIPOFF
