Bart should really reply to this. He's quite persuasive on the topic. A Bad Condorcet winner is a low utility Condorcet winner. For those who see the primary purpose of election methods to elect the highest utility candidate, and see voters as rational utility maximisers, this is a crucially important flaw.
- [EM] Bad Condorcet winners? MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Bad Condorcet winners? Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Bad Condorcet winners? Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] Bad Condorcet winners? Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Bad Condorcet winners? Martin Harper
- Re: [EM] Bad Condorcet winners? MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Bad Condorcet winners? Tom Ruen
- RE: [EM] Bad Condorcet winners? MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Bad Condorcet winners? LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Bad Condorcet winners? MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Bad Condorcet winners? Forest Simmons
- Re: [EM] Bad Condorcet winners? MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Bad Condorcet winners? Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Bad Condorcet winners? MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Bad Condorcet winners? Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Bad Condorcet winners? Bart Ingles
- [EM] Month Approval election results Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Month Approval election resu... Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] Month Approval election ... Tom Ruen
