Mr. Schulze wrote in part-
On the other side, Condorcet methods are criticized very frequently
because the winner depends "only" on the pairwise matrix while
other information is ignored.
--
D- Which is why I suggest an *absolute* YES/NO vote on each choice with only
the YES majority choices going head to head (which only shows *relative*
votes).
How many U.S.A. President candidates could get a YES majority (assuming no
incumbent is running again) ???
More detailed *absolute* info would be nice --- but requiring *too much* info
input from the voters may be asking too much (noting Mr. Simmons' Oregon
FAVOR education efforts).
That is, what is the upper info input limit for the *average* voter about
choices (which would thus be used to determine choices) ---
YES/NO plus ranking (1, 2, etc.) ???
Scale voting (100 to 0) ???
Something else ???
