Mr. Layton wrote- "Reasonable strategy" is a fairly loose term. In an electorate with very inaccurate polling information, reasonable strategy could result in a pretty bad outcome. ---- D- For offices such as U.S.A. President, a State governor or a major city mayor there WILL BE *accurate* polling information. ALL methods have *strategy*/ *gameplaying* problems with 3 or more choices. Is a single winner *tolerable* (i.e. can he/she get a YES majority vote) ??? A *world dictator* is not (yet, at least) being elected by ANY method (in connection with various alleged horrors about getting a *weak* Condorcet Winner).
