Mr. Ossipoff wrote -- As I said, I've probably never heard a complete IIAC definition, other than my actual-votes definition, and these repaired versions of Markus's definition.
My actual-votes definition says: Deleting a loser from the ballots and then recounting those ballots should never change who wins. [end of definition] --- D- I have mentioned more than a few times that there can be (with choice C added to existing choices A and B) --- N1A CAB N1B ACB N1C ABC N2A CBA N2B BCA N2C BAC N amounts = numbers of votes The very routine question is which choice should be a loser if there are 3 or more choices (or more basically if there should be any one loser at a time (or all but one loser at a time ---- other than perhaps Condorcet losers).
