Forest:
The plurality procedure is the only positional method which always elects a
majority candidate when one exists; therefore, one could argue that it is the
positional procedure which maximizes the election of a majority candidate.
SB
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Forest Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Blake Cretney wrote:
>
[...]
> > By best candidate I really mean the best candidate. That is, the
> > candidate that would provide the best government. The candidate we
> > should hope the voters would elect.
>
> I know what you mean, but it is useful to have something measureable to
> maximize so that we can see how close we are to the ideal.
>
>
> > Perhaps I could just define it as the winner of a plurality election?
> > This is just defining the problem away.
>
> But what does the plurality candidate maximize?
>
> Forest
[...]
=====
"Democracy"?:
http://www1.umn.edu/irp/images/postcardAd2.jpg
AR-NewsWI, a news service for Wisconsin animal advocates:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AR-NewsWI/
Favorite Quote:
"They talk about this thing in the head; what do thay call it? ["Intellect,"
whispered somebody nearby.] That's it. What's that got to do with women's rights or
Negroes' rights? If my cup won't hold but a pint and yours hold a quart, wouldn't you
be mean not to let me have my little half-measure full?"
--Sojourner Truth
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
