As my subject line said, I PLEDGE FIFTY DOLLARS TO HAGER AGAIN THIS COMPUTER IS WRITING CAPITAL LETTERS AND THE CAP LOCK DOESN"T HELP
IF IT'S BEST TO CONCENTRATE DONATIONS TO ONE CANDIDATE , IF THERE ARE MORE, THEN I CLAIM THAT THERE'S NO NEED TO WAIT TILL HAGER IS NOMINATED. IT'S IMPORTANT THAT HE BE NOMINATED, SO WE SHOULD HELP HIM NOW. IT'S ADIFFICULT QUESTION, WHETHER TO CONCETNTRATE OR DIVIDE CONTRIBUTIONS. BUT WE'LL GET A BETTER PERSPECTIVE ON THAT WHEN WE GET MORE NOMINATIONS. I RENOMINATE HAGER. AS BART SAID, HAGER MAY BE THE ONLY APPROVAL ADVOCATING CANDIDATE. REGRETABLY THE SMALL PARTIES HAVE BEEN LARGELY WON OVER BY CVD, THE GREENS ARE FOR IRV, AND LOCAL OR STATE LIBERTARIANS ENDORSED SF'S IRV INITIATIVE. BUT I BELIEVE THERE'S A STATE LIBERTARIAN ORGANIZATION THAT USES APPROVAL FOR ITS ELECTIONS. OR MAYBE JUST A LOCAL ONE. I LIKE THE IDEA OF DIFFERENT BRIEF MESSAGES TO SMALL PARTIES, COUNTIES, ETC, TALKING ABOUT ISSUES IMPORTANT TO THEM. OF COURSE WE AREN'T HELPING HAGER TO GAIN INFLUENCE, THOUGH THE DONATIONS COULD OF COURSE SHOW THAT APPROVAL WORK ISN'T ENTIRELY THANKLESS. IF WE HELP GET HIM NOMINATED, IF WE GET HIM MORE MEDIA SPACE, WE ADVANCE APPROVAL. MIKE OSSIPOFF _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
