>Non-monotonicity is a `Paper Tiger'. It needs a bogus example in a
vain
>attempt to prove that IRVing is supposed to be bad for you.
8: A,C 5: B,A 4: C,B [end of quoted
text]
+
1000: A,B
1000: A,C
1000: B,C
1000: B,A
1000: C,A
1000: C,B
Maybe I am mistaken, but this example seems very realistic to me.
And monotonicity is still a problem using IRV....
Examples are not bogus, they are just simplified for an easier
understanding.
I use IRV in my model but I still search for a better method,
I have not yet finished adapting ranked pairs but I think it
can lead to a better result...
St�phane Rouillon.
