> Lately my thinking has been that anyhow even the best election-method > reform will be sham - a diversion from real democracy that makes a > real difference - so long as we continue to use mass elections to > select or legitimize or rubberstamp a governing officer oligarchy.
Joe- I find your suggestions intriguing. I would suggest that better election methods are a necessary step toward your proposals. As I understand it, your goal is to place decision-making authority in the hands of ordinary citizens rather than an elite. To bring that about, we would have to first make the government accountable to us, and then demand the changes you propose. Currently, we have a two-party duopoly. Often the leaders are elected only because their opponents are even worse. A system that allows new options to be competitive is the only way to bring fresh and drastically different ideas into the arena. PR and better single-winner methods are necessary (but obviously not sufficient) steps toward this goal. Alex ---- For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc), please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em
