Adam wrote:
It seems that the benefit of truncation here depends on extensive truncation already present in the ballots. Can anyone make a little more sense out of it? Mike, I remember you stating something about this a while back but I'm not sure. I reply: Yes, I was saying that if there's lots of indifference about the CW, then truncation can steal the election from him. SFC & GSFC tell conditions in which that needn't happen, though they don't specifically mention truncation. Mike Ossipoff _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com ---- For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc), please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em
