Those who use the 1-person-1-vote criterion (1p1v) have repeatedly been
asked to justify it in terms of something more fundamental, something
other than a rule-criterion.
Apparently they aren't going to. It can only be assumed that they
admit that 1p1v can't be justified.
As I said, a rule-criterion won't be accepted on EM as a fundamental
standard, and therefore needs justification in terms of something
more fundamental than itself.
Mike Ossipoff
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
----
For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc), please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em
- Re: [EM] 1-person-1-vote has been abandoned? MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] 1-person-1-vote has been abandoned? Dave Ketchum
- Re: [EM] 1-person-1-vote has been abandoned? Alex Small
- Re: [EM] 1-person-1-vote has been abandoned? Dave Ketchum
