Dear Craig, you wrote (19 Dec 2002): > Mr Schulze wanted a clear question : here is one: is that > proportionality inside of the topic of preferential voting: > (a) implied by the given clones rule, or > (b) implying that rule, or > (c) fully or partly replacing it.
"Independence from clones" has been defined only for single-winner elections. "Proportionality" has been defined only for multi-winner elections. Therefore, there is no overlap. You wrote (19 Dec 2002): > The 1987 paper referred to by Markus is listed 2nd in > a short list of only 4 documents by that professor. Here is a longer list: http://www.econ.vt.edu/tideman/vita-new-re927.pdf Markus Schulze ---- For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc), please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em
