I find it confusing to call Marcus Shulze's method, which he sometimes calls the "beat path method," the "Condorcet method." It is not the same as the Kemeny Rule, which, according to the following, is the same as Condorcet's method:
"Condorcet's maximal agreement method is identical with Kemeny's method, albeit the terminology differs slightly." (_Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them_, by Hannu Nurmi, pg 18.) --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Forest Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > In general if we both sink sort and bubble sort the method order, and then > go with the order that yields the smaller Kemeny sum, the method is > converted into a Condorcet method satisfying reverse symmetry. > > Who can find the simplest example that shows that this Condorcet method > does not always yield the Kemeny order? Steve Barney Richard M. Hare, 1919 - 2002, In Memoriam: <http://www.petersingerlinks.com/hare.htm>. Did you know there is an web site where, if you click on a button, the advertisers there will donate 2 1/2 cups of food to feed hungry people in places where there is a lot of starvation? See: <http://www.thehungersite.com>. ---- For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc), please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em
