Dear Olli,
Although Balinski and Young support Webster over Huntington-Hill it
seems that there are other points of view in trying to see which of
these methods is "fairer," even with regard to the matter of bias over
time with respect to small and large states. After all, the constitution
has a bias in favor of "small states" by giving each of these states one
seat. One might try to sort out the bias due to the constitution vs. the
bias due to the method.
Best,
Joe
--
Joseph Malkevitch
Department of Mathematics
York College (CUNY)
Jamaica, New York 11451
Phone: 718-262-2551
Web page: http://www.york.cuny.edu/~malk
----
For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc),
please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em
- Re: Population paradox Joe Weinstein
- RE: Population paradox Narins, Josh
- RE: Population paradox Forest Simmons
- Re: Population paradox Joe Weinstein
- Re: Population paradox Joseph Malkevitch
- Re: Population paradox Olli Salmi
- RE: Population paradox Joseph Malkevitch
- RE: Population paradox Narins, Josh
- Re: Population paradox Joseph Malkevitch
- Re: Population paradox Joseph Malkevitch
- RE: Population paradox Forest Simmons
- RE: Population paradox Narins, Josh
- RE: Population paradox Narins, Josh
- Re: Population paradox Joe Weinstein
- Re: Population paradox Joseph Malkevitch
- RE: Population paradox Narins, Josh
