Bart wrote:
Besides, the subsequent media organization-sponsored recounts all showed the same outcome. Bush won. Get over it.
I reply:
Is that what the mass media said? Maybe, but I heard that the facts were different. Big-money-owned mass media sometimes aren't the best source for reliable information about issues that are important to their owners.
What I read and heard was that, contrary to what was claimed by the media that you refer to, Gore would have won the count if the Supreme court hadn't stopped it.
Aside from that, when you say "won", do you mean legitimately won? Do you believe that Bush legitimately won if that only happened because, even by the incomplete count, Bush only won because many Black Democrats were turned away or barred from voting, in numbers far greater than Bush's slim margin in that incomplete count? Some of those Black voters were told falsely that the polls were moved. Some were told that they were no longer registered or couldn't vote. Some were barred from voting with the alleged justification of removing felons from the polls, though many who were not felons were unjustifiably removed in that process.
In no sense did Bush win that election. Bush isn't legitimately president. An unelected nonpresident is going to use this country's
resources to commit a war crime that world opinion is overwhelmingly
against.
Mike Ossipoff
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
----
For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc), please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em
